Type of Document	Master's Thesis
Author	Thompson, Stephanie Campbell
URN	etd-06142007-160118
Title	Material Selection vs Material Design: A Trade-off Between Design Freedom and Design Simplicity
Degree	Master of Science
Department	Mechanical Engineering
Advisory Committee	Advisor Name Title Farrokh Mistree Committee Chair David McDowell Committee Member Janet K. Allen Committee Member Jitesh Panchal Committee Member Jye-Chyi Lu Committee Member
Keywords	compromise Decision Support Problem design space expansion blast resistant panel Design Capability Indices
Date of Defense	2007-06-12
Availability	unrestricted
Abstract Materials have traditionally been selected for the design of a product; however, advances in the understanding of material processing along with simulation and computation techniques are now making it possible to systematically design materials by tailoring the properties of the material to achieve the desired product performance. Material design offers the potential to increase design freedom and enable improved product performance; however, this increase in design freedom brings with it significant complexity in predictive models used for design, as well as many new design variables to consider. Material selection, on the other hand, is a well-established method for identifying the best materials for a product and does not require the complex models needed for material design. But material selection inherently limits the design of products by only considering existing materials. To balance increasing design costs with potentially improved product performance, designers must have a method for assessing the value of material design in the context of product design. In this thesis, the Design Space Expansion Strategy (DSES) and the Value of Design Space Expansion (VDSE) metric are proposed for supporting a designer’s decision between material selection and material design in the context of product design. The strategy consists of formulating and solving two compromise Decision Support Problems (cDSP). The first cDSP is formulated and solved using a selected baseline material. The second cDSP is formulated and solved in an expanded material design space defined by material property variables in addition to other system variables. The two design solutions are then compared using the VDSE metric to quantify the value of expanding the material design space. This strategy is demonstrated in this thesis with an example of blast resistant panel design and is validated by application of the validation square, a framework for the validating design methods.
Files	Filename       Size       Approximate Download Time (Hours:Minutes:Seconds)     28.8 Modem   56K Modem   ISDN (64 Kb)   ISDN (128 Kb)   Higher-speed Access    thompson_stephanie_c_200708_mast.pdf 3.69 Mb 00:17:03 00:08:46 00:07:40 00:03:50 00:00:19